Mr. Bloated...I mean, Cheney.
1. How much room do you think the court will actually give the "terrorist mastermind" to defend himself? Saying that he has a leg to stand on is giving him a leg to stand on. He has none. He is a brainwashed, maybe, psychopath who will burn in hell for the crimes he's help commit and the lives he has wasted. He has no defense. And by the U.S. giving him a trial, we are showing how compassionate a nation we are. If we were any other third-world backward nation, we'd have just shot him in the head by now without giving him his civil right to a last word. That's not what we are.
2. Do you consider every trial for every murderer, rapist, thief, etc., to be a platform for those degenerates to spew their messages? What makes this trial any different from that of, say, the Manson family?
3. Our wars create terrorists. Our beliefs create terrorists. Our ways of life create terrorists. Our language creates terrorists. Our hamburgers create terrorists. C'est la f'ing vie.
4. Our leader bowing to a leader of another nation where it is customary is an awesome diplomatic move. Our apologizing may seem to a megalomaniac like you to be subserving our imperialism, but it's also trying to show our compassion and our belief in working with people; not just yelling at them, condemning them and killing them.
5. Thank you for labeling "most" of America as arrogant. What the hell is your definition of exceptionalism? Being a bully? Being a jock? Being a bloodlusting warrior? Or being a leader?
6. Our withdrawal announcement is not telling the terrorists that they are winning. It's saying that we as a nation of sick of fighting an winless war for some other nation. It's telling the Afghanis to get off there asses and start helping themseleves, because losing our men and women is just not worth protecting them anymore. It's also showing that we've strayed from our original goals and we need to recoup and try again. Protecting the Afghanis was not our mission. Finding Bin Laden and striking out against Al-Qaeda was our goal. Chasing the Taliban (which in Arabic means students), who are more or less brainwashed and corrupted children, is not our mission. We are wasting time and lives in Afghanistan and we need to get out of this situation.
7. On that note: We are not Russia. We are not going to send in every last man we have. We are much smarter than that.
8. "If you kill enough Americans, you change foreign policy." No...shit. That is actually how it works. You kill enough of us, we're going to find a way to keep you from killing us.
9. Why did the writer of this article repeat the above quote twice? Propaganda?
10. Who's weak and indecisive? I certainly hope you're talking about yourself and your admin. Tell me, Mr. Cheney, please, spell it out: What is the point of Afghanistan? And if the solution is so simple, why the fuck didn't you deal with it while you were still in office? Why do you keep screaming and bitching about a war you could have fixed.
...the more I hear this sadistic, megalomaniac complain about our situations in Afghanistan, the more I wish he and Bush would be tried for war crimes. I am convinced that we are as far behind in this war because of them. I am convinced, and have been, that Iraq was a useless war and was a major deterrent in the War on Terror. I am so sick of hearing war-mongerers bitch about pacifists trying to find a way out of war.
I could go on, but my heartrate just began to race and I am sweating.
I really should get a commission, a political science degree, and actually start shouting back at people like Cheney.
And I'm losing my train of thought. He is a sadist. A bloodthistry, gunfiring sadist. Roar.
10 comments:
seriously though, for the last time, stop reading fox news online! Generates too much negativity for you. Think you should avoid that website and channel at all costs for a little while...then go back to it in order to get some balance...seems like you find too many stories that get you fired up...should cool it a little :-)
I don't see how that's my fault...
Then again, I am biased toward properly used journalism. NPR and BBC...beautiful.
And I do use it for balance. I read something on CNN, BBC, Allgemeine, or MSNBC and I look and see how FOXNews bastardized it.
teehee.
lol.
I'm not saying its your fault, I'm just trying to suggest something that might help you avoid some negativity :-) both in reading and writing.
Iraq was necessary as a platform for a new puppet government that would be more diplomatic with the U.S.
Read about Athenian Democracy, it explains that a Democracy is and will always be an Imperialist nation, or risk ruin and bankruptcy.
We must continue our nation building to supply our country with allies, materials, fuel, etc.
If we retreat and stop our imperialistic goals, the barbarians will be at our gates.
See Rome.
btw, why does Cheney fire you up so much? Why let someone bother you to that point?
I think anybody who sets something on fire and then complains about how it gets put out will put me in a foul mood.
It's not Dick Cheney personally. I actually like his stance on gay rights. But I think him complaining about the new admin taking care of the mess he helped create....it infuriates me.
but what of the fact that maybe, just maybe, Obama and his administration really have no clue...maybe instead of writing speeches about peace, they could actually concentrate on doing something...
actually, if they would just think more about how to fix problems as opposed to writing speeches about wanting to fix problems, maybe this administration would accomplish something.
...you do realize he had to make a speech. It's pretty darn customary to give speeches when you receive an award.
I dont think this admin has problems doing anything, its that they are trying to do too much of everything!
wind down the war, ditch climategate, halt healthcare reform!
we cant afford to do all this wehen we need to be creating jobs across America!
I'm with Eric... you can't change everything at one time. this poor man ran on a "change" platform and has yet to really affect anything substantially since he took office. I do wonder what will be Obama's legacy OTHER than taking control of the white house after George W. Bush.
his legacy will be that he was all talk and no action...if for the simple fact of yes, maybe Obama is trying to do too much...although I am against pretty much a majority of what he wants to do or wishes to see be placed into law...
The award he received is without merit and any true achievement, and he could have very well taken a more bold move of rejecting the award stating he will accept it once he has achieved the change and peace he seeks...think of how much better his legacy would have been...
in fact, I think that would have been the best move for him politically. However, he chose to accept the award, accept the money prize, and give another speech about wanting to change our society and our world...
again, I'm made that he received an award for doing absolutely nothing except for win an election...and for all the talk of the "popular" vote the Dem's spoke of in 2000 and 2004, he really didn't have a "landslide" victory anyway...
sorry, I just think its sad that certain groups of individuals like to use the Nobel Peace price and other special awards as a way to push support for individuals, as opposed to actually awarding the best moves towards peace and science, etc...think about it...GORE received the award for climate change work...and now look at what is going on with that subject...interesting huh?
Obama took on too much, and has the wrong idea on how to fix things...yes, things need to change...but wanting change and being able to deliver on change means commitment and actions...not speeches.
Post a Comment